| New icon |
[Jun. 26th, 2005|10:33 pm] |
So, what's a guy with 100 icon slots for all eternity to do? I only had 18 icons, so it was time to make some new ones.
I am always fascinated at the displays various technologies have to divulge information about the system status to the human operators. In movies, most of these displays just don't make sense. Take War Games, for instance. The WOPR-core is stationed in a sort of clean-room (which was probably de rigeur at the time the movie was made). Along the walls are 19"-racks, with lots of Blinken Lights... And someone is going around the room, armed with a clipboard, and making notes, presumably of which lights are blinking and which not. Obviously, that doesn't convey any useful information (at least not at the cursory glance the bit-part actor is giving it -- apparently Blinken Lights could convey useful information if you knew how to look at it). WTF is up with that? Just a random pattern of blinking lights don't convey any useful information -- why not just pull up a console monitor and have the computer display useful text messages?
Another example is Jurassic Park. The evil hacker has unleashed the dino's and is making off with the genetic data. Our heroes have to master the computer, in order to stop further mayhem from occuring. The girl looks at the screen, and says: "Oh, yeah, this is Unix, I know this." OK, so far so good: all is well in the world when 11-year old girls know Unix, right? But then she navigates through a graphical display with the mouse. WTF is up with that? How is that useful? How is that Unix!?
I think the movie makers want us to feel alienated from technology. The Computer is a mysterious machine that can be used for good or, at the drop of a hat, for evil. And you'd never know until it was too late: the Machines are mysterious and only the High Priests of Technology can mediate for the poor huddled masses. There is a distinct Luddite slant in movies, not just in the past, but also recently (see: I, Robot or The Matrix) -- but that's the subject of a later post.
In honor of the nonsensical displays, I made this icon. Ten points if you can spot where it's from!
(Also, for the enterprising casemodder, there is Project BlinkenLEDs -- I'm available for help if you want to make such a thing!) |
|
|
| Comments: |
Yeah, I'm always incredibly amused about what computer monitors suddenly do (or don't do) in movies. Whatever is displayed on the monitors is always swooshy, bright, shiny and dynamic. Password boxes and windows fly all over the place. The user can open and close 33 windows by pressing 'E' and if he randomly starts hitting keys he's like totally hax0ring!!11 That movie with Sandra Bullock (The Net?) cracked me up. "Look ma! I'm hitting random keys on my keyboard! I'm a l33t hax0r!! Look at all this top-secret shit flying across my monitor so fast I can't read it at all! ph34r the six thousand shiny password boxes!!"
And yeah, the system navigation in Jurassic Park is not just unrealistic but completely inefficient. It'd take forever if I had to fly through my file system in a 3D rendered environment, with my mouse. BUT! It looks neat for the audience! The audience thinks, "Wooo, cool flying effects in 3D on a computer! That must be Super High Tech! Awesome! I'm so impressed!"
And so it is. All non-sensical, flying-windows shiny-graphics blinken-lights computer displays have no purpose but to baffle the audience into believing they're looking at complex technology. ^^
As for your icon... hmmm.. it looks like an oldschool computer game, and you've mentioned playing the first Metal Gear, so maybe that's where it's from?
Hey, Jurassic Park was back in 1993. When 3d graphics were still the new thing on the block. I know how I was impressed as a kid seeing that computer system they had. Nowadays it looks like an overly bright kids forebare version of Windows. Or something. Ah, those were the days...
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/9820224/1085137) | From: fub 2005-06-27 12:06 pm (UTC)
| (Link)
|
When 3d graphics were still the new thing on the block. Perhaps the photo-realistic renderings of dinosaurs as seen in the movie, yes. But like the ones on the computer monitors? Those had been around for years. And frankly, the wireframe animations of Elite on my MSX were more advanced and made more sense than the 'Unix' filesystem they showed.
I know how I was impressed as a kid seeing that computer system they had. I'm sorry to hear that you fall into the demographic that has to be wowed with such shitty nonsense. ;)
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/31585191/1085137) | From: fub 2005-06-27 12:10 pm (UTC)
| (Link)
|
That movie with Sandra Bullock (The Net?) cracked me up. I have to confess that I have successfully avoided seeing that movie -- because I knew it would have lots of nonsense that would irritate me.
There's also Jumping Jack Flash -- and that one is actually pretty spot on. The 'chat'-program Whoopy uses looks a lot like the Unix 'ntalk'-program, except with colors. (I never had a color monitor to use ntalk on, so it could be that that had colors, and I would never know...)
have no purpose but to baffle the audience into believing they're looking at complex technology. And in doing so, they are both insulting the intelligence of the audience, and doing them a disservice by not properly showing how stuff works.
so maybe that's where it's from? Close, but no cigar!
Looks like something from Elite.
Or possibly even the sequal, Frontier (to be honest, I've played Frontier and First Encounters, but never Elite itself)
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/6598687/1085137) | From: fub 2005-06-27 03:49 pm (UTC)
| (Link)
|
Nope, sorry!
The WOPR-core ...
Am I the only one who is still wondering if that name was just one big product placement, paid for by a certain hamburger chain?
How is that Unix!?
Of course it wasn't the standard UNIX interface, but hey, 99.8% of the people watching that movie had no idea what UNIX was at all. The funny thing is that the interface shown actually is a UNIX interface, albeit a GUI which probably no-one has used for any sane purposes: at the same time that the first JP movie premiered, you could download the binaries of this GUI from the Internet for free and have your own little Jurassic Park moment.
I think the movie makers want us to feel alienated from technology.
More important reasons for computers in movies to look the way they look is that: - the average viewer has to immediately understand that this is a _very_ advanced computer system; - the system should not look like an actual computer OS (say: Windows) because the maker of this OS should pay lots of money if they want their OS shown in a movie, _or_ the movie makers want to avoid being sued because of the OS of maker X being shown in a negative way in the movie.
Ten points if you can spot where it's from!
My guess it is some Death Star wireframe from a Star Wars computergame from a long forgotten time.
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/6598672/1085137) | From: fub 2005-06-27 03:53 pm (UTC)
| (Link)
|
paid for by a certain hamburger chain? The name amuses me as well -- you're not the only one.
The funny thing is that the interface shown actually is a UNIX interface Yes, they made one after the movie. Didn't go very far because it sucked. :)
More important reasons for computers in movies to look the way they look is that: Well, the systems in Jurassic Park didn't look very advanced to me -- they were the normal beige boxes you could buy at every streetcorner. The litigation angle could indeed be a reason.
My guess Nope, sorry!
I guess filmmakers don't understand computers. ;) Plus, what is more important, you're regular computer interace isn't "graphic" enough to be interesting. For instance, in You've Got Mail there are entire flocks of doves flying over the computer-screen to signal the user that "they've got mail". I guess that's more interesting for a filmmaker than a little balloon popping up saying "1 E-Mail". Also, the Matrix does have some real computer toodles in it. I like your icon, though I don't know where it's from. :)
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/31585191/1085137) | From: fub 2005-06-27 06:08 pm (UTC)
| (Link)
|
I guess filmmakers don't understand computers.If movies can have military advisors, why can't they have a science/technology advisor? you're regular computer interace isn't "graphic" enough to be interesting.What about Jumpin' Jack Flash? The interfaces there were exclusively textual and did make a lot of sense technology-wise. Also, the Matrix does have some real computer toodles in it.Yeah, I know. Cool stuff there -- using a real-world exploit in a movie.
I alway thought that the blinking light were there because the evil Lair/Nuclear power station also doubles as an disco at saturday night and the person with the clipboard is merely a dancer who is still high on lsd
OOOooh blinkey light Check OOOooh blinkey light Check OOOooh blinkey light Check
Space Quest?
![[User Picture]](http://l-userpic.livejournal.com/31585191/1085137) | From: fub 2005-06-28 09:40 am (UTC)
| (Link)
|
the evil Lair/Nuclear power station also doubles as an disco at saturday night That is the best explanation I've ever heard!
Space Quest? Nope.
What I also like is that when one person is said to be "handy with computers" in a movie, then eventually that person will be able to do anything with it and solve difficult problems within 30 seconds, no matter what kind of problem it is. | |